TheForexGuy
Forex Mentor
1 R is the total risk for the trade. 0.5 is 1/2. So if I risk $100, 0.5R is $50
Hi TFG, 2 points: the momentum trade (aka turtle type strategy) or the anti-move with failure of this (turtle soup) could be played from either side. i.e you could be watching for the turtle move or the failure of that as a trigger. I guess you could go with the turtle move, then flip to the other if you are wrong, but you would have to be very nimble. Have you tried testing this strategy on a pair on forex tester to see what it is like? With the hedging, I prefer the good old doubling down, martingale type strategy as long as I think there is a good chance of mean reversion.
Hi TFG - I wrote an EA some times ago that goes on just opening random positions and managing them through this method.. it is a Martingale system though. The idea was to demonstrate that hedging works asyntotically (i.e. you need a lot of money but at the end it works!) How can I put a link here to my code? is on the mql5 forum - hope this could be interesting. the difference with your approach her is that rather than reducing the lots it opens more, so more risky!
The idea I had here was to create a hedging model that would recover losing trades without any more initial risk. But the problem is I over looked part of the calculation and the term "there is no free lunch" smacked me in the face.
No matter how you do it, if you decide to hedge a trade - you maximum risk usually ends up twice of what you're initial risk was on the trade.
I haven't done any real market testing, I just wrote out all the math formulas on paper and played it out with paper I stuck on my bedroom wall. Some of my visitors said I've turned into 'one of those mad people'.